If, like me, your main Mac has a 2 TB internal drive with over 400 GB in its ~/Documents folder, you only have 50 GB of iCloud storage, and you are still on a slow rural internet connection, this is the option which makes more sense. This is, I believe, by far the most popular choice for iCloud users, as it gives the user most control, and works well with smaller iCloud capacities. ![]() Given the rather opaque behaviour of these different variations, I have been looking at how they work out, with the aim of discovering whether the full Desktop & Documents Folders configuration is now worth considering, and how it works. However, as I have reported here, that is not the way that it works in Sierra 10.12.6 on some Macs at least, nor in High Sierra 10.13.4, and whatever optimisation macOS is supposed to perform can be overridden by user actions, although not normally under user control. Older Documents will be stored only in iCloud when space is needed. The full contents of iCloud Drive will be stored on this Mac if you have enough space. These have the further option to Optimize Mac Storage. the full Desktop & Documents Folders configuration, in which macOS and iCloud manage all files in those folders.plain iCloud Drive, in which the user controls what is put into their shared folders. ![]() Since that troubled launch, iCloud has allowed many variations, but for general file-sharing comes in two main flavours: It only takes a few well-known examples of users losing control, or even worse losing documents, to put most of us off. For many users, iCloud became an unseen hand which snatched their precious files away as fast as their internet connection could carry them. When it first came out with macOS Sierra, the full-on iCloud option of putting your Desktop & Documents Folders into the cloud was often a disaster.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |